On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:32:03AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:21:45AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > So other than the mix up of order parameters I think this should work. > > > > But I'd be wrong, isolated page accounting is not fixed up so it will > eventually hang on too_many_isolated. It turns out it is necessary
Good spot. > to pass in zone after all. The following patch passed a high order > allocation stress test. To actually exercise the path I had compaction > call reclaim_clean_pages_from_list() in a separate debugging patch. > > Minchan, can you test your CMA allocation latency test with this patch? > If the figures are satisfactory could you add them to the changelog and > consider replacing the MIGRATE_DISCARD pair of patches with this version > please? Of course, I will do next week. Thanks! -- Kind Regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
