On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 02:19:14AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:26 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:58:24PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > > > > - Fixed preempt handling in alpha idle loop > > > - added ack from Geert > > > - fixed stable email address, sorry :-/ > > > > > > This time I built tested everywhere but: h8300 (compiler internal error), > > > and mn10300, parisc, score (cross compilers not available in > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.6.3/) > > > > > > For testing, you can pull from: > > > > > > git://github.com/fweisbec/linux-dynticks.git > > > rcu/idle-fix-v2 > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > I have queued these on -rcu branch rcu/idle: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git > > > > This problem has been in place since 3.3, so it is hard to argue that > > it is a regression for this merge window. I have therefore queued it > > for 3.7. > > I don't follow that; I would expect any serious bug fix (serious enough > for a stable update) to be acceptable for 3.6 at this point. > > If the regression occurred in 3.3, then the cc lines should be something > like: > > Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3+ > > and not the current: > > Cc: 3.2.x.. <sta...@vger.kernel.org> > > (Note, version annotations should be on the right of the address, not in > the 'real name' position on the left.)
Ah indeed. Hmm, I don't understand why we took that convention while we can reuse the name that precedes the email to put that information. Anyway, should I resend the patchset with this thing fixed? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
