On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 22:02 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "James" == James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> 
> >>>>> writes:
> 
> James> Plus, I think it fixes a bug where you get different behaviours
> James> from REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC commands when a driver is and isn't
> James> attached (I've cc'd Martin to see what he thinks).
> 
> I'm fine with having the eh action be triggered for FS requests only, if
> that's what you're asking?

Sort of ... I was thinking do it for all non REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC commands
(which includes flush and other strange types), but if you think it
should only be for REQ_TYPE_FS, that's fine too.

James



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to