On Tue, 02 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > As there will be a Device Tree created for the UIBs, there is no > > need to call the UIB initiation functions. Each device will be > > detailed and registered from the Device Tree instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > > Acked-by, but... > > > - .init_late = ux500_init_late, > > + .init_late = NULL, > > Why even define it?
More to show that we're _intentionally_ not using it. I'm happy to remove if it offends you? :) -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
