On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> > As there will be a Device Tree created for the UIBs, there is no
>> > need to call the UIB initiation functions. Each device will be
>> > detailed and registered from the Device Tree instead.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
>>
>> Acked-by, but...
>>
>> > -       .init_late      = ux500_init_late,
>> > +       .init_late      = NULL,
>>
>> Why even define it?
>
> More to show that we're _intentionally_ not using it.
>
> I'm happy to remove if it offends you? :)

No, I was just asking. I did ACK it...

Thanks,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to