On Tue, Feb 27 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > In theory however i2o is a standard and all i2o works alike. In practice i2o > is a pseudo standard and nobody seems to interpret the spec the same way, the > implementations all tend to have bugs and the hardware sometimes does too. That's a pretty good description of standards in general, at least when it comes to hardware :-) -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 David Priban
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 Alan Cox
- RE: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 David Priban
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 Andrew Morton
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 David Priban
- RE: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 David Priban
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 Alan Cox
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 David Woodhouse
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak10... Alan Cox
- i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 Jens Axboe
- i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 Joao Paulo Martins
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 Jens Axboe
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 Alan Cox
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 Jens Axboe
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak10... Joao Paulo Martins
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 Chris
- Re: i2o & Promise SuperTrak100 Andrew Chan