On 10/14/2012 01:13 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
I think the sub-node style above it nicer because it allows referencing the individual clocks outputs with a phandle. We use this chip to generate base-frequencies for audio clocks, and so we have to switch between two freqs for the multiples of 22.5KHz and 24KHz at runtime.
Both examples allow you to have a phandle for all individual clock-outputs. The examples weren't complete but with the sub-node style you'll reference with e.g. <&clkout0> while the flat one will use <&si5351 0>. I still prefer the flat-style as it will not allow to have a phandle of plls. Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/