* Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/19/2012 07:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >>Having the function name indicate what the function is used
> >>for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
> >>the fault handling code largely consists of do_...._page
> >>functions.
> >
> > I don't much care either way, but I was thinking walken
> > might want to use something similar to do WSS estimation, in
> > which case the NUMA name is just as wrong.
>
> That's a good point. I had not considered other uses of the
> same code.
Renaming the functions for more clarity still makes sense IMO:
we could give it a _wss or _working_set prefix/postfix?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
