David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> writes: > Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > >> > (Side note: I hope people realize that the random key is generated >> > with a 100-year lifespan. So if you build a kernel today, you do >> > potentially have a "year-2112 problem". I'm not horribly worried, but >> > I *am* a bit worried about 32-bit time_t overflow and I hope 32-bit >> > openssl doesn't do anything odd) >> >> Yep, David's original patch had that problem; he fixed the kernel's x509 >> handling to use struct tm, not time_t, and now it Just Works. > > That's assuming that 32-bit *openssl* gets it right when generating the key.
Yes, I am assuming that. What openssl did you think I ran on my 32-bit kernel? :) Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
