Yes, your suggested descriptions more match the change. I'm sending a new patch for your review. Thanks.
-Bin On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Bin Gao <bin....@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > MPS tables are not needed for systems that have proper ACPI support. > > This is also true for systems that have SFI in place. > > > > So this patch is to exclude X86_MPPARSE when either ACPI or SFI is present. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bin Gao <bin....@intel.com> > > --- > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > index 46c3bff..b1494bd 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ config X86_X2APIC > > If you don't know what to do here, say N. > > > > config X86_MPPARSE > > - bool "Enable MPS table" if ACPI > > + bool "Enable MPS table" if ACPI || SFI > > default y > > depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC > > ---help--- > > The changelog does not seem to match the patch. Did you want to > say: > > " So this patch allows the configuration (turning off) of > CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE when either ACPI or SFI is present. " > > ? > > Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
