Paul E. McKenney said, at 2012/10/31 19:51: > > The first uses smp_processor_id(), which will complain if > force_quiescent_state() is called with preemption disabled, which it > sometimes is. > > So what am I missing here?
Hi Paul this patch is not right for CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT case. __this_cpu_ptr is ok which do not check for preemption context. > > Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
