On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 04:28:05PM -0600, Mark Langsdorf wrote: > On 11/04/2012 04:08 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 01:51:44PM -0500, Mark Langsdorf wrote: > >> -static struct clk *twd_get_clock(void) > >> +static struct clk *twd_get_clock(struct device_node *np) > >> { > >> - struct clk *clk; > >> + struct clk *clk = NULL; > >> int err; > >> > >> - clk = clk_get_sys("smp_twd", NULL); > >> + if (np) > >> + clk = of_clk_get(np, 0); > >> + if (!clk) > > > > What does a NULL return from of_clk_get() mean? Where is this defined? > > Well, it's a valid path if (np) is NULL. I'll add an IS_ERR(clk) and > resubmit.
Hang on - what logic are you trying to achieve here? Wouldn't: if (np) clk = of_clk_get(np, 0); else clk = clk_get_sys("smp_twd", NULL); be sufficient? If we have DT, why would we ever want to fall back to "smp_twd" ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/