On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 17:12 +0100, Krzysztof Mazur wrote: > It would require using atomic ops because also pppoatm_pop() can > modify this word. I think it's better to add additional word instead > of using atomic ops.
Or use the existing flags word, perhaps. Only one bit of which is actually used already. We'd have to filter the new bit out in pppoatm_devppp_ioctl(). -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
