On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:39:53AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> Right. Something like this then, instead of my previous patch 8/7?
> 
> Only addresses the sock_owned_by_user() case and not ATM_VF_RELEASED,
> ATM_VF_CLOSE or !ATM_VF_READY, but your amended patch 6 fixes that I
> think.
> 

Looks and works ok after:

diff --git a/net/atm/pppoatm.c b/net/atm/pppoatm.c
index 7b8dafe..87e792c 100644
--- a/net/atm/pppoatm.c
+++ b/net/atm/pppoatm.c
@@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ static int pppoatm_assign_vcc(struct atm_vcc *atmvcc, void 
__user *arg)
        atmvcc->user_back = pvcc;
        atmvcc->push = pppoatm_push;
        atmvcc->pop = pppoatm_pop;
+       atmvcc->unlock_cb = pppoatm_unlock_cb;
        __module_get(THIS_MODULE);
        atmvcc->owner = THIS_MODULE;

With this change:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzys...@podlesie.net>

This patch should be also acked by Chas, at least changes in generic ATM
code (maybe as separate patch).

I need also an ack for new version of patch 6 (pppoatm: drop frames to
not-ready vcc).

Maybe we should schedule tasklet in pppoatm_unlock_cb() only when it's needed.


Thanks,

Krzysiek

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] pppoatm: wakeup after ATM unlock only when it's needed

We need to schedule wakeup tasklet only when ATM socket locked
was previously locked. The locking is provided by the sk->sk_lock.slock
spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzys...@podlesie.net>
---
 net/atm/pppoatm.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/atm/pppoatm.c b/net/atm/pppoatm.c
index 87e792c..841b9f8 100644
--- a/net/atm/pppoatm.c
+++ b/net/atm/pppoatm.c
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct pppoatm_vcc {
        enum pppoatm_encaps encaps;
        atomic_t inflight;
        unsigned long blocked;
+       int need_wakeup;
        int flags;                      /* SC_COMP_PROT - compress protocol */
        struct ppp_channel chan;        /* interface to generic ppp layer */
        struct tasklet_struct wakeup_tasklet;
@@ -113,7 +114,10 @@ static void pppoatm_unlock_cb(struct atm_vcc *atmvcc)
 {
        struct pppoatm_vcc *pvcc = atmvcc_to_pvcc(atmvcc);
 
-       tasklet_schedule(&pvcc->wakeup_tasklet);
+       if (pvcc->need_wakeup) {
+               pvcc->need_wakeup = 0;
+               tasklet_schedule(&pvcc->wakeup_tasklet);
+       }
        if (pvcc->old_unlock_cb)
                pvcc->old_unlock_cb(atmvcc);
 }
@@ -292,8 +296,10 @@ static int pppoatm_send(struct ppp_channel *chan, struct 
sk_buff *skb)
 
        vcc = ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc;
        bh_lock_sock(sk_atm(vcc));
-       if (sock_owned_by_user(sk_atm(vcc)))
+       if (sock_owned_by_user(sk_atm(vcc))) {
+               pvcc->need_wakeup = 1;
                goto nospace;
+       }
        if (test_bit(ATM_VF_RELEASED, &vcc->flags)
                        || test_bit(ATM_VF_CLOSE, &vcc->flags)
                        || !test_bit(ATM_VF_READY, &vcc->flags)) {
-- 
1.8.0.268.g9d5ca2e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to