OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp> writes: > Namjae Jeon <linkinj...@gmail.com> writes: > >> 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp>: >>> Namjae Jeon <linkinj...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of >>>> file/directory removal and creation. >>> >>> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". Please >>> explain why we need this change. >>> >>> IIRC, timestamp handling in FAT driver is strange historically. Anyway, >>> FAT doesn't have "inode change time". It is "creation time" in FAT. >> Hi. OGAWA. >> I made this patch after comparing timestamp handlings with MSDOS and XFS. >> Should timestamp handling of FAT be same with MSDOS ? >> Am I missing ? > > What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS?
BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
