Namjae Jeon <linkinj...@gmail.com> writes: >>> What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS? > Okay, the description of patch was lacked, So I will resend patch with > specifical test reseult with other filesystem. >> >> BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical. > "historical" means It is difficult to change ?
The timestamp handling was not same with unix fs from initial, and FAT doesn't have inode change timestamp. This historical reason it is not better to change to same with unix fs, and never be possible to support inode change timestamp cleanly. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
