On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:18:34PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Tuesday 13 November 2012 01:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >I'm not sure your wake_base setting is sane here - this is expected to > >be a register. If it is a register why is it not a #define? > There is no wake register. Here I kept for the incerease the wake > conut so that irq_set_irq_wake() can be called. So you want to write to random registers in the chip instead... that doesn't seem like a terribly clever idea. > I think it is also not correct after change > regmap: irq: initialize all irqs to wake disabled > I need to set the irq_wake(0 without the register. I can't really parse any of the above, sorry. > There is 2 sets of registers which need to be configure, MASK and > LINE enable. So what does the second one do?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature