On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:01:26PM -0500, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >This does not seem sensible. Why would this be optional if it is > >useful? In any case, what you're doing in the driver here is clearly > >not the way forward.
> I was thinking of adding wake_enable in struct regmap_irq_chip and > decide the wake support based on the value if wake_enable true or > wake_base is non-zero. then wake support should be enable. > The wake register write will happen only when wake_base is non-zero. But to repeat my question why would this be optional?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature