On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:24:45PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, maybe there is one. Perhaps we can make acpi_platform_notify() > call acpi_bind_one() upfront and only if that fails, do the whole > type->find_device() dance? Of course, acpi_bind_one() would need to > be modified slightly too, like in the patch below. > > If we did that, acpi_i2c_add_device() would only need to assign acpi_handle > as appropriate before calling i2c_new_device() (and analogously for SPI). > > What do you think?
This is certainly better than the thing we use currently. It makes adding I2C and SPI support much shorter and simpler. If others don't object I would suggest that we switch to use this method. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
