On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:48:44 +0100 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com> wrote:
> > As this patch is already in -next and is stuck there for two more > > weeks I can't (or at least won't) merge this patch, so I can't help > > with any of the above. > > I will fix both issues in the next version of the patch. Would like to > merge it to your tree or should I keep it in my dma-mapping tree? The patch looks OK to me now (still wondering about the -stable question though). It would be a bit of a pain for me to carry a patch which conflicts with one in linux-next, and this patch doesn't appear to conflict with the other pending dmapool.c patches in -mm so you may as well keep it in the dma-mapping tree now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
