Quoting Shawn Guo (2012-11-28 07:17:44)
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:58:02PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:16:12AM -0600, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> > > I'd
> > > have to move most of the logic of hb_set_target() into
> > > clk_highbank.c:clk_pll_set_rate() and then add extra logic for when
> > > cpufreq is not enabled/loaded.
> > 
> > You only need to move hb_voltage_change() into cpu clock's .set_rate()
> > hook with no need of checking if cpufreq is enabled or not.
> > 
> Need to also check whether frequency or voltage should be changed first
> in .set_rate() though.
> 
> Shawn
> 

The notifiers in the clk framework might be a better place for this than
just simply hacking the logic into the .set_rate callback.

I haven't looked at the definition of hb_voltage_change but does the
call graph make any clk api calls?  Are you talking over i2c to a
regulator?  If so then you'll probably hit the same reentrancy problem I
hit when trying to make a general solution.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to