> Oh, maybe I wasn't clear - I wasn't talking about statistical > significance but rather about practical significance.
OK. I will not argue with that :) > A minuscule speedup (a lot less than 1%) showing only in a *single* > workload so far and relevant only for a *very* *small* number of linux > users - only those who build their own kernels - is simply not worth > including in the kernel. My only confusion is why some of these are already included in the linux kernel source today, for example CORE2. As I stated in my previous email, the two 'new' ones I tested preform as-good-as or better-than the CORE2 which is already included. Does my confusion make sense? Thanks again for the consideration! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
