On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > Notice that one member of struct acpi_bus_ops, acpi_op_add, is not > used anywhere any more and the relationship between its remaining > members, acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start, is such that it doesn't > make sense to set the latter without setting the former at the same > time. Therefore, replace struct acpi_bus_ops with new a enum type, > enum acpi_bus_add_type, with three values, ACPI_BUS_ADD_BASIC, > ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH, ACPI_BUS_ADD_START, corresponding to > both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start unset, acpi_op_match set and > acpi_op_start unset, and both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start set, > respectively. >
Can we expand the BUS_ADD_* concept to other devices instead of just acpi_device? aka we should let struct device has this add_type field. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
