Hi Rafael,
I have worked out a patch set to clean up ACPI/PCI related
notifications,
please refer to
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg17822.html
The patchset doesn't apply cleanly to Bjorn's latest pci-next tree. I
will
help to rebase it if needed.
Regards!
Gerry
On 12/11/2012 10:26 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, thanks for the pointers. I actually see more differences between our
>>> patchsets. For one example, you seem to have left the parent->ops.bind()
>>> stuff in acpi_add_single_object() which calls it even drivers_autoprobe is
>>> set.
>>
>> Sorry, that should have been "which calls it even when drivers_autoprobe is
>> not set". I need to be more careful.
>>
>
> oh, Jiang Liu had one patch to remove that workaround.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git;a=commitdiff;h=b40dba80c2b8395570d8357e6b3f417c27c84504
>
> ACPI/pci-bind: remove bind/unbind callbacks from acpi_device_ops
>
> Maybe you can review that patches in my for-pci-next2...
> those are ACPI related anyway.
>
> those patches have been there for a while, and Bjorn did not have time
> to digest them.
>
> or you prefer I resend updated version as huge whole patchset?
>
> Thanks
>
> Yinghai
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
