On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:22 AM, James Hogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/12/12 03:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 12/05/2012 08:08 AM, James Hogan wrote:
>>> On 64 bit architectures with no efficient unaligned access, taskstats
>>> has to add some padding to a reply to prevent unaligned access warnings.
>>> However this also needs to apply to 32 bit architectures with 64 bit
>>> struct alignment such as metag (which has 64 bit memory accesses).
>>
>> Wait... 64-bit struct alignment on structures with only 32-bit members?
>> That might be... interesting... in a number of places...
>
> I'll rewrite the description as it's a bit misleading. On metag 64bit
> struct alignment is required when it contains 64bit members, not if it
> only contains 32bit members. Although metag is a 32bit arch, it can do
> 64bit memory accesses which must be aligned.
The C alignment rules should take care of this automatically (struct alignment
is the maximum alignment of its members).
You only have to override this manually in cases like this, where
64-bit quantities
are stored in char arrays:
struct buffer_data_page {
u64 time_stamp; /* page time stamp */
local_t commit; /* write committed index */
- unsigned char data[]; /* data of buffer page */
+ unsigned char data[] RB_ALIGN_DATA; /* data of buffer page */
};
(cfr. your other patch).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
