On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 14:43 -0600, Jacob Shin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:40:11PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:34:35PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > decode_mc2_mce does > > > > > > pr_emerg(HW_ERR "MC2 Error: "); > > > calls > > > fam_ops->mc2_mce() > > > which may not emit anything > > > and if it doesn't, does > > > pr_emerg(HW_ERR "Corrupted ..."); > > > on another line leaving a trailing colon without > > > newline from the pr_emerg above. > > > > Ok, this is in Jacob's patch AFAICT, I'll review those tomorrow but > > thanks for the heads-up. > > Okay, I'll wait until your feedback before sending V2 > > > > > > I believe the second pr_emerg should be pr_cont > > > > Actually, it should be > > > > pr_emerg(HW_ERR "\nCorrupted...\n"); > > > > to finish the initial pr_emerg. > > Okay, all of the other decode_mc*_mce functions needs to change then.
Hi Jacob. I don't think that's necessary. Using any pr_<level>("\n...") is just not good form. I think the pr_cont would be fine, it's the same form as all the other decoded continuations. The new pr_emerg is effectively a termination of the previous one. There's no need for 2 consecutive uses of pr_emerg(HW_ERR ...) here. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/