On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:49:25 +0000, David Howells wrote: > Provide reinclusion guards in the empty uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h to make sure > that the patch program doesn't delete it. > > However, should some part of asm/hw_breakpoint.h actually be exported here, > or, possibly, should the entire uapi file be removed? In v3.6, though the > file was marked for export to userspace, it had nothing outside of __KERNEL__. > > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> > cc: Jean Delvare <kh...@linux-fr.org> > --- > > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h > b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h > index e69de29..895596b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +#ifndef _UAPI_I386_HW_BREAKPOINT_H > +#define _UAPI_I386_HW_BREAKPOINT_H > + > +#endif /* _UAPI_I386_HW_BREAKPOINT_H */ >
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <kh...@linux-fr.org> -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
