Provide reinclusion guards in the empty uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h to make sure that the patch program doesn't delete it.
However, should some part of asm/hw_breakpoint.h actually be exported here, or, possibly, should the entire uapi file be removed? In v3.6, though the file was marked for export to userspace, it had nothing outside of __KERNEL__. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> cc: Jean Delvare <kh...@linux-fr.org> --- arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h index e69de29..895596b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +#ifndef _UAPI_I386_HW_BREAKPOINT_H +#define _UAPI_I386_HW_BREAKPOINT_H + +#endif /* _UAPI_I386_HW_BREAKPOINT_H */ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
