On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Friday, January 04, 2013 04:03:01 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
>> >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
>> >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>> >> struct pci_sysdata {
>> >> int domain; /* PCI domain */
>> >> int node; /* NUMA node */
>> >> + void *acpi_handle;
>> >> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> >> void *iommu; /* IOMMU private data */
>> >> #endif
>> >>
>>
>> acpi_handle is not good name and it is confusing.
>
> Well, what would be a better name in your opinion?
>
> I was going to put that into a #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI / #endif, so what about
> calling it acpi_data?
yes, with #ifdef, you can use acpi_handle type directly.
it is acpi handle for pci_root.
so would call int pci_root_acpi_handle ?
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
