On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:50:59AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > rcu: Provide RCU CPU stall warnings for tiny RCU > > Tiny RCU has historically omitted RCU CPU stall warnings in order to > reduce memory requirements, however, lack of these warnings caused Thomas > Gleixner some debugging pain recently. Therefore, this commit adds RCU > CPU stall warnings to tiny RCU if RCU_TRACE=y. This keeps the memory > footprint small, while still enabling CPU stall warnings in kernels > built to enable them. > > This is still a bit on the high-risk side, so running this will likely > be a debugging exercise. > > Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mcken...@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Did you generate this patch with something other than git? The formatting seems a bit off: it doesn't have a diffstat or the usual "---" line between the commit message and the patch. This patch seems reasonable to me, but the repeated use of #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_RCU_TRACE) seems somewhat annoying, and fragile if you ever decide to change the conditions. How about defining an appropriate symbol in Kconfig for stall warnings, and using that? - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
