On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 17:38 +0000, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 08:37:33AM +0000, Alex Shi wrote: > > If parent sched domain has no task allowed cpu find. neither find in > > it's child. So, go out to save useless checking. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex....@intel.com> > > --- > > kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 ++---- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > index 3c7b09a..ecfbf8e 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > @@ -3378,10 +3378,8 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int > > sd_flag, int wake_flags) > > load_idx = sd->wake_idx; > > > > group = find_idlest_group(sd, p, cpu, load_idx); > > The previous patch changed the behavior of find_idlest_group() to > returning the local group if it is suitable. This effectively means that > you remove the recursive search for a suitable idle sched group. You > could as well merge find_idlest_group() and find_idlest_cpu() to avoid > iterating through the cpus of the same sched group twice.
find_idlest_* could stop when seeing 0 too, can't get much more idle. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/