On 01/09/2013 01:43 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Enable the first PCIe root port which is connected to an FPGA on the
> Tamonten Evaluation Carrier and add device nodes for each of the PCI
> endpoints available in the standard configuration.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-tec.dts 
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-tec.dts

> +     pcie-controller {
> +             vdd-supply = <&pci_vdd_reg>;
> +             pex-clk-supply = <&pci_clk_reg>;
> +             status = "okay";

Sorry this is also really picky. I'd prefer properties that exist in
/include/d files and are overidden here to appear first, followed by new
properties. In other words, move the status property to be first. I
believe/hope all the other (Tegra) .dts files follow this convention.

> +             pci@1,0 {
> +                     bus-range = <0x01 0x0a>;
> +                     status = "okay";
> +
> +                     pci@0,0 {
> +                             reg = <0x010000 0 0 0 0>;

Hmm. The unit address in that node name doesn't match the address in the
reg property, although I suppose there's nothing we can do about it
since those formats are both defined by the standard PCI binding?

What do the numbers "0,0" represent here; device/function? Is the same
true for the "0,0" in the child nodes?

> +                             bus-range = <0x02 0x0a>;
> +
> +                             compatible = "plda,pcie";

Are there DT binding documents for all these devices; plda,pcie,
ad,pcie, ad,pcie-test, etc.?

> +                             pci@4,0 {
> +                                     reg = <0x022000 0 0 0 0>;
> +                                     bus-range = <0x07 0x07>;
> +
> +                                     compatible = "ad,pcie";
> +                                     device_type = "pci";
> +
> +                                     #address-cells = <3>;
> +                                     #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +                                     pci@0,0 {
> +                                             compatible = "opencores,uart";
> +                                             reg = <0x070000 0 0 0 0>;
> +                                     };
> +                             };

Do you need to include a node for the UART; I can see you need to for
the SPI/I2C controllers so you can instantiate the appropriate devices
on non-probe-able buses, but I think you can just let regular PCI device
probing find the UART, Ethernet MAC, etc., can't you?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to