Hi Daniel,

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:22:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> 
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:11:50 +0100 Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > On 01/07/2013 11:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > 
> > > All the commits in the cpuidle tree have been included upstream before
> > > v3.6-rc1.  They were rewritten before being merged upstream and so are
> > > now causing merge conflicts in linux-next.  Could you please reset the
> > > head of your tree
> > > (git://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git#cpuidle-next) to
> > > be somewhere in the tree that yours is merged into (pm or Linus').
> > 
> > Sure. I believe it is done now.
> 
> Yep, thanks.

Unfortunately, you reset your tree to be a version of the pm tree that has
now been rebased :-(  This is now causing more conflicts in linux-next.
Maybe you should reset your tree to be the same as one of Linus' -rc
releases for now.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email protected]

Attachment: pgpo2RmtfReGY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to