Anton, V3 patch caused a build failure in Linux-next tree. So, I updated to v4 patch. Tony already applied the latest one.
You don't need to do anything. And I'm sorry for the confusion. Seiji <snip> -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 6:55 PM To: Luck, Tony Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Seiji Aguchi Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ia64 tree Hi all, After merging the ia64 tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64_allmodconfig) failed like this: ERROR: "pstore_cannot_block_path" [drivers/firmware/efivars.ko] undefined! Caused by commit 1a1df768ea4e ("efi_pstore: Avoid deadlock in non-blocking paths"). I have used the ia64 tree from next-20130110 for today. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au <snip> > -----Original Message----- > From: Anton Vorontsov [mailto:an...@scarybugs.org] On Behalf Of Anton > Vorontsov > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 10:38 PM > To: Seiji Aguchi > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Luck, Tony (tony.l...@intel.com); > dzic...@redhat.com; dle-deve...@lists.sourceforge.net; Satoru > Moriya > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] pstore,efi_pstore: Avoid deadlock in non-blocking > paths > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 06:08:52PM +0000, Seiji Aguchi wrote: > > Changelog > > v3 -> v4 > > I am confused. Tony already applied v3, no? Do you expect me to do anything > with these patches, or is it just an update for Tony? > > Thanks, > Anton