On 1/15/2013 4:06 PM, Kumar, Anil wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 17:49:13, Nori, Sekhar wrote: >> On 1/10/2013 1:07 PM, Kumar, Anil wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 18:17:46, Nori, Sekhar wrote: >> >>> I do not think that it is good idea to move NAND pin mux information >>> into da850.dtsi because this information is evm specific. >>> if we will use this approach then we must use the same approach for >>> other modules also as ASoC etc. >> >> Why do you consider this EVM specific. IOW, which pins do you see >> changing on another board? BTW, if there are additional pins needed than >> what are listed, we can always add more pinux entries in the .dts files. >> The pins present in dtsi file should the base case. > > Ok, we can use this approach for DaVinci as its SoC modules do not > have multiple pin configuration option. I will do the changes in > next patch series.
You could do this even if this was the case by defining multiple pin groups. Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
