On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 01:47:48AM -0200, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> > > By the description and looking at commit c278531d39, this change isn't
> > > needed for 3.0 or 3.4 kernels (anything <= 3.6), they don't contain
> > > commit c278531d39.
> >
> > Ah, good catch. Should this be reverted from 3.0 and 3.4?
>
> I judge it as unecessary from what I saw so far, can ext4 developers
> and/or people in Cc confirm? It should be harmless, only consequence is
> an uneeded lock being taken now in 3.0/3.4
It's not worth it to revert it. The lock is being taken in a
completely non-fastpath, as well as guaranteed-to-be non-contended
code path.
We're not requiring that the lock be taken in 3.0 and 3.4, but
arguably it's still a good idea to take it from a consistency point of
view.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
