--On Tuesday, April 03, 2001 18:17:30 -0700 Fabio Riccardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > Indeed, I'm using RT sigio/sigwait event scheduling, bare clone threads > and zero-copy io. Fabio, I'm working on a similar solution, although I'm experimenting with SGI's KAIO patch to see what it can do. I've had to patch the kernel to implement POSIX style signal dispatch symantics (so that the thread which posted an I/O request doesn't have to be the one which catches the signal). Are you taking a similar approach, or is the lack of this behavior the reason you are using so many threads? --Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Mike Kravetz
- Re: a quest for a better sched... Fabio Riccardi
- Re: a quest for a better sched... Mike Kravetz
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better sched... Davide Libenzi
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Alan Cox
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Fabio Riccardi
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Alan Cox
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Fabio Riccardi
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Christopher Smith
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler alad
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a better schedul... Kanoj Sarcar
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a better sch... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a better... Kanoj Sarcar
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a b... Andrea Arcangeli