On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Hubertus Franke wrote: > It is not clear that yielding the same decision as the current > scheduler is the ultimate goal to shoot for, but it allows > comparision. obviously the current scheduler is not cast into stone, it never was, never will be. but determining whether the current behavior is possible in a different scheduler design is sure a good metric of how flexible that different scheduler design is. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Alan Cox
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Fabio Riccardi
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Alan Cox
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Fabio Riccardi
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Christopher Smith
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler alad
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a better schedul... Kanoj Sarcar
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a better sch... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a better... Kanoj Sarcar
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a b... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for... Zdenek Kabelac
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Khalid Aziz
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a better schedul... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar