On Sat, Jan 26, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Olaf Hering [mailto:o...@aepfle.de] > > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 3:00 PM > > To: KY Srinivasan > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Greg KH; Jan Beulich (jbeul...@suse.com) > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Hyper-V: register clocksource only if its > > advertised > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > > Your current approach of using the "Partition Reference Counter" > > > feature bit is very fragile. Let us assume that future Windows guests > > > depend on this feature; Xen would certainly emulate this to have a > > > "good" emulation of Hyper-V and we are back to square one. > > > > If Xen starts to emulate the "Partition Reference Counter" feature, > > wouldnt it also advertise this feature? > > Olaf, did you get a chance to investigate why the viridian bit was set > for the Linux HVM domain.
I dont know, most likely XenServer sets this per default? > I am thinking of re-sending the patch for delivering the Hyper-V vmbus > on a separate vector without a run-time check. Let me know. Are you also acking/nacking this patch? Olaf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/