> This silently drops intx=1 for unhalted_ref_cycles. This event
> only works on fixed counter. So I am wondering what I am measuring
> here. In general, I don't like when settings are silently dropped because
> the user will be misled into thinking the modifier was applied when in
> fact it was not.

Ok. I can look at it later, but I don't think it's a show stopper.

Error handling in general was never a strength of perf.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to