(2013/01/25 13:09), Sasha Levin wrote: > As to arch_check_optimized_kprobe() and check_kprobe_address_safe(), this > is simply way too confusing. It doesn't make sense that a function named > check_[...]() would modify any of it's parameters. > > For example, that entire block within KPROBES_CAN_USE_FTRACE should be split > out and go into update_kprobe_for_ftrace() or something similar. > > If that makes sense, I can send a patch to split out all the parts that > modify anything in those two functions out of them.
I see, that makes sense :-) Thank you, -- Masami HIRAMATSU IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: [email protected] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
