Hi Ben, > On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 11:43 -0800, Bing Zhao wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > > > know. > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > From: Avinash Patil <pat...@marvell.com> > > > > > > commit bbea3bc432dc5c08d09ca5c80afdd82515470688 upstream. > > > > This patch is not for stable kernel. > [...] > > Right, I've managed to pick up 3 changes to mwifiex that it looks like I > shouldn't have included. Firstly: > > 9c969d8ccb1e mwifiex: check wait_event_interruptible return value > > This had "3.6+" to the left of <sta...@vger.kernel.org>, whereas I > expect version qualifiers to be on the right. So my import script just > put this in the queue without asking me to interpret the version > qualifier. (I don't automate *that* because people use too wide a > variety of syntaxes.)
Sorry. From now on I will put version qualifiers on the right side of <stable@vger...> > > When trying to apply that, I found that it seemed to depend on these > two: > > bbea3bc432dc mwifiex: wakeup and stop multiple tx queues in net_device I'd rather classify this patch as an enhancement because the code change is relatively large. To play it safe, let's drop this patch from -stable. > b7097eb75fa1 mwifiex: handle association failure case correctly This is a bug fix indeed. > > which also looked like they were important fixes. Presumably I should > drop all of those? Please drop bbea3bc432dc only. I can resend a backport of "b7097eb75fa1 mwifiex: handle association failure case correctly" for 3.2-stable. Thanks, Bing
