From: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> "cpufreq" directory in policy->cpu is never created using sysfs_create_link(), but using kobject_init_and_add(). And so we shouldn't call sysfs_remove_link() for policy->cpu(). sysfs stuff for policy->cpu is automatically removed when we call kobject_put() for dying policy.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Tested-by: Dirk Brandewie <[email protected]> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 9656420..2817c3c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1058,7 +1058,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif cpus = cpumask_weight(data->cpus); cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, data->cpus); - if (unlikely((cpu == data->cpu) && (cpus > 1))) { + if (cpu != data->cpu) { + sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq"); + } else if (cpus > 1) { /* first sibling now owns the new sysfs dir */ cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpumask_first(data->cpus)); sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, "cpufreq"); @@ -1083,7 +1085,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif pr_debug("%s: removing link, cpu: %d\n", __func__, cpu); cpufreq_cpu_put(data); unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu); - sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq"); /* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */ if (cpus == 1) { -- 1.7.7.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
