On 02/05/2013 05:58 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:54 PM, <dirk.brande...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brande...@gmail.com>
There is an additional reference added to the driver in
cpufreq_add_dev() that is removed in__cpufreq_governor() if the
driver implements target(). Remove the last reference when the
driver implements setpolicy()
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brande...@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 622e282..d17477b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1049,6 +1049,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev,
struct subsys_interface *sif
if (cpufreq_driver->target)
__cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+ if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy)
+ cpufreq_cpu_put(data);
I don't understand this patch at all.. I grepped both cpufreq_cpu_get() & put()
in bleeding-edge and found everything to be correct.
Can you please point me to the exact line numbers ?
Line 878 in cpufreq_add_dev()
--Dirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
