On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:10:28PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > Timers more precise than 100HZ aren't probably needed - as MIN_RTO is 0.2s > and MIN_DELACK is 0.04s, TCP would hardly benefit from them. On networking bandwidth shaping and traffic control generally need higher precision timers. There are also people who don't like the minimum 10ms delay for non-busy wait, it's apparently a problem for some apps. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mark Salisbury
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mark Salisbury
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mikulas Patocka
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! David Schleef
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mikulas Patocka
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! David Schleef
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mark Salisbury
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mikulas Patocka
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Andi Kleen
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! root
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! watermodem
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! george anzinger