> Timers more precise than 100HZ aren't probably needed - as MIN_RTO is 0.2s > and MIN_DELACK is 0.04s, TCP would hardly benefit from them. There are a considerable number of people who really do need 1Khz resolution. Midi is one of the example cases. That doesn't mean we have to go to a 1KHz timer, we may want to combine a 100Hz timer with a smart switch to 1Khz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mark Salisbury
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mikulas Patocka
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! David Schleef
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mikulas Patocka
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! David Schleef
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mark Salisbury
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Mikulas Patocka
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Andi Kleen
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! root
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! watermodem
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Alan Cox
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! george anzinger
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! mark salisbury
- Re: No 100 HZ timer ! george anzinger