> I guess 386 could live with an exception handler that emulates it. 386 could use a simpler setup and is non SMP > (BTW an generic exception handler for CMPXCHG would also be very useful > for glibc -- currently it has special checking code for 386 in its mutexes) > The 386 are so slow that nobody would probably notice a bit more slowness > by a few exceptions. Be serious. You can compile glibc without 386 support. Most vendors already distribute 386/586 or 386/686 glibc sets. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: rw_semaphores Tachino Nobuhiro
- Re: rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
- Re: rw_semaphores Tachino Nobuhiro
- Re: rw_semaphores David Howells
- [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix David Howells
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Linus Torvalds
- x86 cpu configuration (was: Re: [PA... Jeff Garzik
- Re: x86 cpu configuration (was:... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... David Weinehall
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... David Weinehall
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores ... Andi Kleen