On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 02:56:32AM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: > My reasoning is that the choice of computer is a direct function of > your financial situation. I can get hold of a lot of 386's/486's, but > however old a Pentium may be, people are still reluctant to give away > those. Doing the sometimes necessary updates on my 386:en is already > painfully slow, and I'd rather not take another performance hit. As long as you don't use multithreaded applications there is no performance hit with a kernel-mode CMPXCHG handler. iirc most multithreaded applications are either too bloated for a 386 anyways, or trivial so that it doesn't matter. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Linus Torvalds
- x86 cpu configuration (was: Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semap... Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix David Weinehall
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix David Weinehall
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox