On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilo...@ti.com> [130206 14:54]:
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c
>> @@ -602,6 +602,7 @@ void __init omap4430_init_late(void)
>> omap2_common_pm_late_init();
>> omap4_pm_init();
>> omap2_clk_enable_autoidle_all();
>> + omap_soc_device_init();
>> }
>> #endif
>
> Looks like this should be called for all omaps instead
> of just omap4430?
>
> I suggest you create omap_common_init_late() that
> calls all the common init_late functions:
>
> static void __init omap_common_init_late(void)
> {
> omap_mux_late_init();
> omap2_common_pm_late_init();
> omap_soc_device_init();
> }
>
> Needs to be verified that these really are common to
> all omap2+ though :)
Yes, you are right, currently these functions are common to all
init_late callbacks that we have right now in io.c
I will prepare additional patch soon...
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
