Ignore the setting and show "Only SM0/SM1 can set slew rate" warning is enough,
then we can return 0 instead of -EINVAL in tps6586x_regulator_set_slew_rate().

Otherwise, probe() fails.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel....@ingics.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c 
b/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c
index e68382d..51da3f9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static int tps6586x_regulator_set_slew_rate(struct 
platform_device *pdev,
                break;
        default:
                dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Only SM0/SM1 can set slew rate\n");
-               return -EINVAL;
+               return 0;
        }
 
        return tps6586x_write(parent, reg,
-- 
1.7.9.5



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to